Finch’s posterous

Easy peezy lemon squeezy. 
« Back to blog

Visualizing ArtPrize: Mapping the Entries and Top 25

Since the ArtPrize competition and venues are all over the city I wanted to see how their locations affected the voting of pieces. While you could gather some of this insight without visualizing it like this, it would be very difficult, and definitely not as nice looking.

Using SpatialKey I brought in ArtPrize data which consisted of 1263 entries. The data was a basic spreadsheet of the entries that I had to just save as a CSV file and the rest was geo-coded by the application. (Thanks to Joe Force & Vince Dudzinski for providing the data and asking me to visualize it in SpatialKey)

Once in SpatialKey I was able to cut, slice, and filter the information to answer some questions I had, like:

How are the art pieces distributed around town? I first rendered a heatmap (Screen 1: Heatmap) of the distribution of the ArtPrize pieces around Grand Rapids. Then I tried another visualization (Screen 2: Green Circles) to show the actual numbers of pieces in the various locations.

Where are the Top 25 located?
Using the Top 25 currently listed on the site I marked those entries and filtered out the rest to show (Screen 3: Blue Circles) where they are located. They seem to be located more in the center of town and I found that 7 of the Top 25 are located in The B.O.B. That makes sense since it is hosting 156 of the entries (the most of any other location).

How many of the Top 25 are Michigan artists (vs artists outside of Michigan)? Taking the Top 25 I split up the visualization and found there are 12 Michigan artists (Screen 4: Orange Circles) and then there are 13 artists from outside of Michigan (Screen 5: Green Circles). I was surprised to find that none of the artists from outside of the US were in the Top 25. Maybe they were in bad venue locations?

Where are the pieces from artists outside the US located? In the last screen I turned the layer back on showing all of the entries (Grey Circles) and placed a layer of where the artists from outside the US (Blue Circles). I found that they are distributed fairly well throughout the competition, so the fact none of them are in the Top 25 doesn't have much to do with location.

           

Comments (8)

Oct 01, 2009
Vince Dudzinski said...
heh. As much as I'd love the credit - it all goes to Nicolas westbrook for the data. I'm just a designer-type. He's a developer-data-type. :)

--Vince

Oct 01, 2009
Joe said...
Great job! I love the way you presented the data!
Oct 01, 2009
Matthew Stork said...
A fantastic breakdown of the data. I think geographical location has much to do with the numbers than artist-density-per-venue. While the B.O.B. did indeed end up with almost 33% of the top 25, I feel it had more to do with location than what artists they actually showed. My venue had roughly 65 artists (almost 42% of the B.O.B.'s density) yet had no artists even in the top 100. If it were just about artist density, my venue should have returned a total of 3 of the top 25 based on the B.O.B.'s statistics. Yet being even 4 blocks away from the B.O.B.'s epicenter area was enough to slow that traffic. If my venue had been in the square next to the B.O.B., it conceivably would have received a similar vote ratio because of traffic patterns and voting predictability rather than actual artistic content.

Location, location, location!

Great work Mr. Finch! Aesome post, really.

Oct 01, 2009
Sarah said...
Thanks so much! I hope this gives people a clearer understanding of ArtPrize and location. I'm sure studies like this one will aid in next years competition.
Oct 01, 2009
Tommy Allen said...
It is hard not to take it personal, but com'on people Visual number 2, the green dots, completely leaves off Tanglefoot Studios which hosted one the most impressive collections of artwork.

While not the largest, the BOB carnival event won that title, but the overall pedigree of work presented at Tanglefoot was stellar.

In the future please be more sensitive to the fact that this venue is a huge icon of our city's artistic culture and worthy of any attention it receives. To continue to snub it in the way it has been dealt with by members of ArtPrize only makes the planners look amateurish or just lazy.

The over 900 people who attended the the Saturday night opening last weekend was not a fluke.

Sorry to rant but it has been bugging me and I have been silent until today.

Other than that, the maps are cool.

Oct 01, 2009
anonymous said...
Tommy -- I heard that the Tanglefoot pieces were fantastic, but I wasn't able to get out there with my schedule/two kids/etc.,etc. So I missed some great stuff even though I was very interested in seeing it. My thinking is that Tanglefoot and other outlying venues should be dropped as ArtPrize venue if people can't (or won't) go to them. The organizers should do whatever they can to level the field next year and take the location factor out of the equation (as much as possible).
Oct 01, 2009
Brian McFeely said...
Why is it that even on facebook there are no photos of the artwork itself? Just a bunch of talk and pictures of name badges. What is the point of that? I registered, but was never told that I needed a password, all I was told was that I needed my name and the internet to vote.

Like American idol, texting the vote is going to give people votes who might not deserve them. Just because you have a cell phone does not make you a decent art or music critic. (Think Sanjaya)

I certainly hope that the person with the best exhibit wins. There was a very cool Ice exhibit at the Gerald Ford museum. I would have liked to vote for that, it was stunning. It was called "surf and turf".

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    Connect    twitter